Mr. Usinger, congrats on your new found fame in Cyberville. I will not try to take that from you, but I have found a dead horse that screams to be beaten.
This is from the first of several posts of yours on the ADGI thread as you carried out your self-appointed mission to slander John Rossi, and criticize anything and anyone who occupied the same folders that he (and countless others) frequent:
From Peter Usinger to John Rossi in the ADGI folder:
John Rossi,
Are you the same John Rossi, that started the OMGD thread.
Why am I not surprised to find you involved with ADGI.
(Indeed, let us examine this frightful criminal act, I say Hang him and let the buzzards pick his bones...but what of that. Please define "involved with", what are you implying?)
To all others:
According to a former Director of OMGD (Omnigene Diagnostics)
Mr. Rossi can be linked to Mr. Scacci (president of OMGD),
("Linked" to Mr. Scacci, interesting, it's a shame you never expounded on this "link"...perhaps living in Boca Raton is evidence enough for your lynching party?)
who himself seems to be among the evolving crown jewels
of empty-shell creation. Together they are a bunch of professional
stock-promoters, I guess. Unfortunately, the companies they promote are not worth the paper that carries their logo.
(Together they are a bunch of professional stock promoters YOU GUESS??????....mighty fierce words for a guess!!!)
You might wanna have a brief look at the recent developments
at the OMGD thread. It's very educating - one could say: it's
ADGI in its early stages - worth a developmental study.
(One could also say it is a slander suit waiting to happen Mr. Usinger, one which probably has as much merit as many other frivolous law suits which juries routinely award large sums of money for....I ask you again, do you feel lucky?)
Tell me if I'm wrong.
Peter, you're wrong, about me, you're wrong about several assumptions you have made in your crusade. I am not sufficiently informed, motivated, or qualified to judge the merits of Omni-whatever, the SEC is, whatever they say pretty much goes. As to the merits of the Times article, my OPINION of it is it's just more sensationalist garbage, with the only notable characteristic being your name which I recognize from your nasty disposition, and your failure to respond to a repeated request that you present FACTS before making all kinds of allegations about people and companies of which you are obviously clueless. Nice try though, with a little practice perhaps you can learn the art of reason.
|
