My third and last post today as a Trial Member,
Dear marianna and Graystone,
First marianna (re your post Nø 3295),
" Also spoke to Mr. Roger Dupis,, Vice President of American CHamber of Commerce..,,, as president being the U.S. Ambassador to
> Bolivia.. Mr. DUpis says he knows Dr. Turner.. and speaks highly of
> him,, he is at this very moment checking with his mining industry
> people ,, and asked me to call him back in 2 - 3 hours ,, will
> advise further.."
I can't seem to find anything about the reply. It was something said apparently by TokyoMex at the time. Did Mr Dupuis come back after checking with his "mining industry people" ? (TokyoMex, if you are lurking out there, could you please answer this ?) Thank you.
To Graystone,
If you go back to this one :
ragingbull.com
XHOWX explains here why drilling is not necessary in this type of deposit. (I guess this guy knows what he's talking about).
And then you've got Dr Hausen (former Newmont Mining Chief mineralogist) who states in the USA Today article dd 07/01/98, that this is "a unique and unusual deposit and an experienced company wouldn't have trouble recovering it".
So this backs up even more XHOWX's post. If Dr Hausen states this (IMO), there has to be gold down there. In which quantity, of course, IS the question... I can't see someone in his position backing a scam...
IMHO, if a deposit is "unique and unusual", then the geology of the deposit and the methodology to recover the gold HAS to be "unique and unusual".
JMO = Just My Opinion!
Everybody have a good day,
I'll probably be back tomorrow,
Best regards and happy trading to all,
Paul in Geneva, soon heading home |
