Marty, I have not been a frequent poster to this thread. I did spend a great deal of time with DD on tsig some weeks ago. I alluded to disbelief and skepticism of some Mr. Gordon's answers to the 6/30 questions posed by Gambler and Beebs......I have recieved numerous private messages and Publicly posted requests from Mister Ex and later yourself to publish my DD.
I refrained from posted my DD and negative opinions on the thread during the recent rally from .17 to over .40. If it were my intent to bash I would have most certainly done so then.
My motive for posting is in consideration of those on the thread such as Sandi and others who have expressed honest concerns over their investment in TSIG.
Although Sandi's concerns were open and honest they were met with harsh and inconsiderate "What is your motive" "Maybe you are Wiseowl's wife" ect. Whenever honest concerns are expressed on the thread the poster is bombarded with criticism and quickly "railroaded" off the board.....After all Marty, One could just as easily ask the same question of yourself....How do we know that you are Martin E. Frankel...perhaps you are actually Mr. Gordon in disguise. Eloquently posting assurances of TSIG long term success as an investment......What is your motive in frequently posting to the thread?...After all, You have stated that you are committed to a long term investment "years" with TSIG......Thus nothing that is posted to this thread will ultimately affect your long term holdings. Your investment over the course of time will be dictated by What the company actually does and how it performs over the next few years. Thus, why all of your continual posts assuring others regarding the short run.......Do you have a "save the world" complex that compels you to help others make wise investing decisions?
Marty, I do not agree with you that my previous post was merely repetition. My future posts will also contain new information.
Ultimately it is up to each of us to weigh whatever information we have available to make our own investing decisions.
Best Regards, JAB
P.S. I just printed out the new S-8 that you referred to in your post. It appears that what many have referred to as "my bashing" in drawing attention to the "possibility" that the CCI deal could come unwound has actually taking a step closer to that reality. Those CYA statements "that are nothing more then lawyer b.s." do at times actually have teeth. It seems somewhat unresponsible that just a few days ago Mr. Gordon could so dogmatically claim that "CCI is a 100% done deal......If you truly believe Mr. Gordon, why even speculate on the merits/concerns of the new S-8. It will never happen according to Mr. Gordon, "It is a 100% done deal" (post #1594 item #4)
However, if one is inclined to view Mr. Gordon's statements with skepticism then the merit/concern over the new S-8 should be considered for their benefit.
A brief review of the filing does not indicate that the all benefits are in favor of tsig. Surprisingly, no mention is even made that CCI must refund the $2,250,000 that Mr Gordon has claimed that TSIG has already paid CCI.
Additionally, The licencing agreement implies that Mr. Piercy and company will continue to operate as an entity in competition with TSIG. And while TSIG can develope their own base of customers they will have to start from scratch. The agreement does not indicate that Mr Piercy and Co. have agreed to turn over their 1 million plus base of customers to TSIG. Doing so in fact would essentially put Mr. Piercy and Co. out of business.
This would put TSIG in the position of having to generate a tremendous amount of advertising to attract customers to their site. Advertising that I doubt they will be able to buy with company stock. It will take plenty of something TSIG has very little of....$$..CASH..$$
JAB |
