****OT****
We at Top Dog research companies in detail by making phone calls, plane trips to their facilities, and doing countless of hours of investigation.
Then why is your vaunted "DD" so often so embarrassingly wrong? And your picks so frequently unsuccessful? You've got a regular string of little beauties: CSHK, BNEZD (reverse split within days of Jim's initial post about it), PKGP (now USXP, a real disaster, reverse split again, and you should have seen it coming), MTEI, PRWT (hasn't done a thing), SGNC, and so on. Quite a stable. The dartboard method would work better.
Your announcements online consist almost entirely of hype and rumor about impending news. The latter often turn out to be wrong, but what the hell, sooner or later there WILL be news because BB stocks need frequent press releases if they're to keep interest alive, so you can say you were "right". But if all else fails, you can blame the Evil MMs (about whose real methods you know less than nothing) and the equally Evil Bashers.
The fact that neither of you has any training in this stuff, or very much knowledge, doesn't seem to bother you in the least.
Sorry, but I think what you do is very dangerous--both for investors and for markets--and I believe you, and all newsletter writers, should be subjected to licensing exams and subsequently to regulations. |
