SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : VD's Model Portfolio & Discussion Thread

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Singleton who wrote (5283)7/14/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: Biomaven  Read Replies (2) of 9719
 
Peter,

even more useful exercise would be 10x in 3 years

Peter S, could you outline such a case for SEPR?

I don't actually think SEPR could produce x10 in 3 years - it is just starting from too high a base, as you would need a market cap > $10 billion. It's much easier to see x10 in 5 years, as by then it could look like a mini big-pharma, with serious revenue coming from all the antihistamines, and in particular norastemizole, which is 50-50 with J&J and could easily be a billion dollar drug. Within 5 years they could easily have 1/3 of the albuterol market, which is another $500 million in revenue to them. Add to these a deal with Lilly for Prozac II, and a deal with J&J for Propulsid II, and it's not hard to see profits in the $300m after tax or more range, with a steep enough growth to support a PE in the 30's.

Of the stocks I own, clearly MOGN could produce x10 in 3 years if MGI-114 turns out to be another Taxol, but this is a pretty low probability event. Similarly NTII could produce this return if Memantine turns out to be a winner, mainly because it is starting from such a low base. Of course NTII is probably equally likely to be a x0.1 candidate <G>.

My best candidate for a x10 in 3 years is PCYC. It's starting from a fairly low base after its recent decline (current market cap of around $200m, plenty of cash) and hasn't given away any US rights to its drugs. If GD-Tex works as well as I think it does and continues to show low toxicity, it could end up being used on most if not all radiation treatments (700,000 a year), which at a $2k or higher price per treatment is real money. Their artery roto-rooter application has similar home-run potential, but is earlier in their pipeline.

Peter
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext