Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (12038)	7/14/1998 7:23:00 PM
From: Electric	Read Replies (3) of 42787

Lisa, I know.. unreal spin, I have been listening. Lucky that I dont think it will run hard, so if I lose a buck, thats ok, I also own RMBS calls.. So that might offset it. I cant believe how they are saying how INTC wrote down inventories etc, and adding that in made them beat the number. The Co has always wrote down inventories, so what is new? Also component prices are getting cheaper, thus they ought to be having lower component prices anyway, right? Unreal rhetoric. Losing margins, but the third Q is flat to above the current Q.. isnt the 3rd Q always the best Q? If the stock goes up, it is because the street wants it to, if this were another stock we wouldnt be seeing this type of unreal spin..

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next