> A better arrangement is not let GREEDINESS taxing on the
> general customers. A better arrangement is to agree TODAY on
> the protocol.
Just like X.25, Frame Relay(remember the Gang of Four??), and ATM?
Give me a Break!!! I hate it when engineers with no hands-on
practical experience get in the way of progress! Where have you
been the last 100 years? If the individual vendors did not push
the technology window, it would never get done! Period!
It was'nt the educational powers at hand that did it, it was
the REAL ENGINEERS building previous technologies who knew the
limitations, and how to correct them with new ideas.
Do you think that Cisco/Stratacom/Digital/Northern-Telecomm were
going to wait around for ANSI and the ITU-T to decide on a
standard for Frame Relay you are nuts! They did it on thier
own and created an industry standard, that later would be
accepted world wide as the Gang-Of-Four LMI spec. It's still
here today and ALL vendors support it. ANSI/ITU-T did agree
on a standard some years later, but guess what!, 90% of GoF LMI
was impemented in thier standards! Hell, the standards bodies
still have'nt aggreed on an implementable sololution for SVCs
in Frame Relay!
> USRX is too selfish to charge for that PROTOCOL
> that they have and really there is not blah blah blah
Right! I won't even comment on this silliness.
PRB |
