|
Vanni: I wonder how many people currently on this thread know that you have been hyping this stock since it was in the mid-twenties. Moreover, how many people on this thread know that you go on other threads claiming to have made money as a long on this stock, since you have posted on at least two occasions that you made money on the only two bounces it has had since it came down from the mid-teens. Now you claim that the risk reward of an investor losing all of his money is less than the potential of making five times his money--a figure that you have pulled out of your hat. That is absurd. Capital preservation is always the name of the game in investing. If you lose 50% on a stock, you need to make 100% on the next trade of a stock. Worse yet, once you have lost all your money you become relegated to posting absurd messages on SI. Having reviewed your recent posts, they seem to be confined to four different topics--Thread Morons, Tasteless Jokes, FPAM, and spamming IOM. Thus, while it is obvious that you participate in SI for "fun", because your asset base has become virtually non-existent, people who are new to this thread should know that you have a very poor record, and an even worse record about claiming you have had successes. And as you know, Vanni, you have attacked me as a liar even though I have posted the very posts of yours that you claim do not exist. Indeed, you have indicated in one post that you wanted to write some sort of newsletter because people who are members of SI are gullable. So let me put this together. You want to make a living selling stock advice to members of SI because they are gullable, you more than any other member of SI have recommended the worst performing stock in the entire US market for the past three months (as per Barrons) and your participation on SI is limited to Thread Morons, Jokes, spamming Iomega and promoting FPAM. I would say that you are truly a pathetic person who needs to be ignored, but I think your record speaks for itself. |
