SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: O'Hara who wrote (19171)7/15/1998 10:34:00 PM
From: mark silvers  Read Replies (1) of 39621
 
Shalom

<<"I don't believe in a literal interpretation" always manages to rear it's ugly head. As well as do the following phrases..."That is a misinterpretation, or you are taking it out of context.>>

I did not say that you misinterpreted or took anything out of context.
I said that I, personally, have a hard time with literal interpretation. I went out of my to say that I have no problem with your believing it. I am not trying to create a "i am right and therefore you are wrong" argument that happens so often on this thread. frankly, I am not smart enough to just proclaim that my opinion is better than yours. I dont know that it is. I only know how i feel, and what seems to work for me.
I am just as entitled tonot believe in literal interpretation as you are to believe in it.

<<...it is those types of passages that create a problem for me with
respect to literal translation, or even certain passages of the Bible entirely.

Please tell me, if you will ,just what passages give you a problem? Especially since I did not interpret any passage.>>

I apologize for my wording. I just dont agree with the passage you pasted in your post. It doesnt ring true for me. that doesnt mean that it shouldnt have great and legitmite meaning for you.

<<To me, that passage doesnt answer the questions of my prior post. It doesnt make sense to me, and just saying well trust it anyways, doesnt work for me.

Sorry Mark, I am at a total loss by that statement. I have no idea what you are referring to. I quoted many passages. What doesn't make sense to you? Trusting what? Could you please be more specific?>>

Again, i apologize. when i post, I am usually at work and trying to go as fast as i can. sometimes my thoughts are clear to me, but arent expressed as eloquently as i would hope to be able to. sorry.

what I meant was that passage oe your post in general didnt answer the questions that i had asked in my posts to bob and Steve. the trusting [art i in reference to the old adage, tht faith(trust) is necessary to believe the bible. If you dont understand it, just hve faith that it is right. That doesn't work for me.

<<I am happy that it does work for you and gives you comfort. I wish you nothing but the best with it, but personally, I need more.>>

I ws eferring to your beliefs in general. I am truly happy that you derive great comfort in Jesus. I wish you nothing but the best in your religious
pursuits(sincerely). However, they just dont work for me.
Again, I am not saying that I am right and you are wrong. I am only stating the status of my current beliefs and that they feel right for me.

I get the impression that my comments, if not my presence, on this thread irritates you. If htat is true, I am sorry for that. I am not apologetic for my beliefs, but for the fact that we cant communicate with more and greater understanding for and of each other. I hope that changes in the future.

mark
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext