Don, you misunderstand. I don't think there is anything of substance for Cycomm to report this week - meeting or Not. If there was, Bud would report it.
Meaningless PR does no one any good.
The point I tried to make was that professional investors don't need a warm and fuzzy press release to buy. They tend to be more analtical then emotional. They also tend to accumulate a position over time.
<<general public awareness of Cycomm>> ??? Just how much do you think the "general public" cares about secure computing and communications?
<<It has not been the institutions that have run this stock up 3 fold>>
1) What makes you so sure of that?
2) If that's so, what news or event in particular do you attribute this rise to?
<<If there is not a reasonable flow of information to the investors then the stock will fall back>> This is not msft or at&t, there is only so much news. I would hate to see BS PR.
<<The Cycomm message has NOT reached the small investor and I have seen no real effort to get it out to them... Have you?>>
I have no problem with Cycomm's efforts to get the word out. Oldtimers remember, we asked for a website, we got one. We asked for better PR, we got it. We asked to get this stock moving, they hired a company to help Bud do it.
Small Investors - Frankly, small investors (buying on their own) are not going to move this stock. They do not understand the company nor the market. Which is a shame, because with cycomm's small float, small investors could control this stock.
Don, what would you like to see Cycomm do to further create a demand for our baby?
Best wishes, matt |
