Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 46.96

-2.8%

Jan 16 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeff Fox who wrote (60533)	7/16/1998 11:56:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Jeff, RE:Jim, re:"not quite up to the task"? What task? In who's judgement, yours? Fuchi's? Petz's? "Why not ask did the Celeron-266 achieve Intel's objectives for this product?"... It's not just my opinion but a general industry opinion. It was either Paul or Tony who said they couldn't figure out why Intel would put out a chip that was capable of such ridicule. Has the Celeron achieved Intels objective? Yes and no. It did allow Intel to move solely to Slot one. Since the Pentium II relies so much on the L2 cache for speed, then it was removed, the Celery gained a reputation of a dumbed down chip. Like a 486SX. Personally I'm glad the product mix in the 2 qtr was only 5% Celeron. Since the Celeron wasn't ramped for the whole qtr so this will increase but the Mendocino won't be up to quite as much ridicule.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next