SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: FMK who wrote (3407)7/17/1998 5:15:00 PM
From: MGV  Read Replies (1) of 27311
 
Persistence in the absence of guile, that you are Fred.

The practice of "pull(ing) an article about a company prior to release if they become aware that its existence has been leaked and there is an unequal dissemination of information" is one that the editors of financial magazines share in unawares with me.

"unequal dissemination of information" What information?

Inside information? Public information?

If it were inside information that Red Chip received from an insider, any release at any time would be violating the confidence of their insider source and they would not publish. In that case, there would be no report.

If it were inside information that Red Chip discovered in the course of their business, the info would, by discovery, become public and be publishable. Your fictional report would be released.

If the info (in your fictional "pulled" report) were public, then there would be no prohibition against publishing. In the last case, the advance "leaks" you spuriously cite would be called advertisements Fred. They generate interest and sell copies. They are encouraged by Red Chip. Red Chip would suffer no constraints to releasing your fictional report and happily would do so.

In none of the cases would there ever be a scenario in which they might have published but for leaks and SEC penalty.

Once more Fred. There is no report.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext