SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG)
AENG 0.00010000.0%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: shashyazhi who wrote (1478)7/18/1998 1:11:00 AM
From: 246810  Read Replies (1) of 3383
 
Hi shashyazhi, glad you're back.

You wrote, Even those who have a fairly intimate acquaintance with the conventional internal combustion engine are led astray by
the horsepower output from such an apparently small engine.


It is a pretty small engine. I think the OX2 was demonstrated at 170 lb ft torque at 1250 rpm. That is 40 hp and piston speed of ~2500.

Yes, the cam profile affects the speed at any point, and we are talking average speed, so can't we shape the cam to increase the early acceleration and reduce the peak speed? (The crankshaft engine piston follows simple harmonic motion with (relatively) slow initial acceleration and fast mid-stroke velocity.)

You wrote, Initially the OX2 engine befuddles the mechanically unsophisticated person. I agree. I do not understand the sketch that shows the transfer of the torque from the cam to the cam follower to the cruciform to the guide pins to the rotating container to the output shaft. I think, intuitively, the friction wear on such small bearings and sliding surfaces will be high. I read on the Yahoo board from a UofW student that the demo there was cancelled due to engine troubles regarding lubrication. How do you feel about wear?

246810
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext