C-Cube Message Board - Msg: 5237443

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : C-Cube

CUBE 36.64

-0.5%

Dec 5 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Rarebird who wrote (34445)	7/18/1998 7:22:00 AM
From: SC	Read Replies (3) of 50808

<<C-Cube is not owned by Warren Buffett. His methodology has no relevance whatsoever to Cube. Your comparing a N.Y. Sirloin Steak with a Big Mac! >> Dear Rarebird, To have pointed out that Warren Buffett doesn't own C-Cube regarding my previous post is very insightful! So please allow me to start with Warren Buffett's relevance with Big Macs since you have brought them up: How could Buffett have made big bucks on Big Macs and be a lot richer than you are if I can assume you are not Bill Gates in disguise? :) Or if Big Macs are too low tech in comparison, have you concluded that Bill Gates has made even more money because he is very good at selling MSFT stocks than Windows? Or if MSFT is too "soft"ware in comparison, has Intel used your stock promoting prescription for C-Cube to have become so successful for its chip business and its investors alike? Or if Intel's CPUs just can't be compared with C-Cube's MPEG decoders, is Rarebird's approach more relevant than Buffett's that we should help C-Cube to "sell" more CUBE stocks than ZiVAs?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next