SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Information Architects (IARC): E-Commerce & EIP
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: My Father's Son who wrote (6948)7/18/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (2) of 10786
 
Interesting that it took two months for Ingram to formerly respond to the charges they failed to pay ALYD $700,000. At first I was surprised that ALYD had the "guts" to sue them considering we're talking David vs. Goliath in a sector where image is important. I suppose ALYD figures their surging earnings, continued growth, and customer endorsements speak for themselves, not to mention that they are the plaintiffs here. As they've continued to ink contracts with other billion dollar companies like AMD and continue to forecast excellent growth, that speaks volumes about their perception in the industry. I still have hope the WSJ and/or the wire services will pick up the story under my theory that no publicity is bad publicity. It still amuses me that one of the most recognized Y2K companies is ZITL, who has yet to book a dollar in Y2K revenue.

- Jeff
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News