Rob, I'm trying initiate a conversation about trading strategy and price expectations given the need of insiders to secure their windfall, thus my previous two posts:
www2.techstocks.com
I have reason for hammering Marion for bringing to our attention the article she does in her post; there are various way's to interpret it, and if you are conspiratorial-minded enough, you can easily interpret this article as an "Amazon Quality while being thrifty, ever demanding the most intelligent for you, our wonderful customers" hype promo piece. Just look at the MF board to see that it has already started that sentiment--albeit from some NEW posters to that board. Who could they be?...
My second, and less paronoid post, which really asks us to do some strategic thinking about possible alliances and trading moves, follows:
www2.techstocks.com
No disrespect intended, Rob, but the valuation arguments are moot at this point; that is to say, of no value IMHO. I used to participate actively in these discussions and I would crunch all the numbers using every concievable valuation technique from page hits to intergalactical distribution agreements. There is no point; hasn't been for at least $120. At $10, I would rejoin the conversation--as a BEAR!.
I believe we can think ourselves forward four or five moves here with enough contributions from some of the obviously intelligent people who contribute here. And I think this because I believe there are only certain options for the insiders at this point; they're down to a few pawns, a queen, and the devilishly religious piece, a wild bishop--the retail moron. But all movement is limited and calculable. With the present astronomical price and earnings coming out on Tuesday, there are insider and outsider forces that are soon to be arrayed in oposition--unless there is collusion...
Can we discuss the number of limited combinations of moves we might see--given all possible legal and illegal scenarios?
Lee |
