SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Graham and Doddsville -- Value Investing In The New Era

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: porcupine --''''> who wrote (410)7/18/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: porcupine --''''>  Read Replies (2) of 1722
 
[#517] [Wayne:] "But purchases made in the 1927-1929 period were under water or close too it 20 years later."

[porc:] "Not if they had dollar-cost-averaged."

My statement is technically incorrect. What I meant to say was that the "portfolio" would not have been underwater 20 years later -- in fact, as stated several times elsewhere, it would have been up by 8% annually.

To refocus, yet again, what I wrote, in part, in #519 (which is consistent with what I have been writing for more than 3 years), was:

"In this light, my prediction remains that over the 20+ year time
frame that people are typically investing for, very few part-time
investors will be able to outperform dollar-cost-averaging into a
low-fee Indexing product."

"Yes, but.......................................................", is not really "yes", so much as it is "but.......................................................".

These "buts" serve to frighten and confuse the average investor -- and encourage him or her to pursue a course that is all but statistically certain to fail to outperform the simple advice of dollar-cost-averaging into a low-fee Indexing product.

Yes, stocks bought in 1929 took a long time to return to their purchase price. That's the whole point of dollar cost averaging: We don't know in advance which is the 1929 and which is the 1933 (Graham certainly didn't), but we do know in advance that the bargain priced shares have always made up for the overpriced shares over a 20 year time frame.

We also know that missing a bottom by one month out of every 12 has been severely penalized over the long run (5% annually). And, we know that a mechanical d-c-a program takes out all of the guesswork about which months to be in the Market and which months to be out, unlike pondering how high is too high, etc.

As Graham commented, vast fortunes can be made by getting out at Market tops and back in at bottoms, but the likelihood of the average investor succeeding in this course is similar to that of finding money growing on trees in the backyard.

[#509:] [Wayne:] "No doubt. Most investors should dollar cost
average."

I have to agree with Wayne on this one --'''':>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext