Joseph,
They probably could, if they knew how, (do you ?), but then I would know they had something to hide.
The main point is, my kids, nor I, frequent these rooms.
(I must admit, I have found evidence that my 17 year old son has been in a few of them, but I would be upset if he wasn't curious about the opposite sex)
The main point still is censorship.
Who will decide who sees what, and what is indecent? Bob stated that the nude pictures in National Geographic were not pornography. I am sure if you went to almost any church in America and asked that same question, you would find at least one person that would not agree. So who gets to dictate what we can see and what we can't see?
I think we should get back to whether or not ZAP is a good investment or not. IMHO, the outlook on my investment hasn't changed because of the alignment with Bianca.
If you think the outlook on your investment has changed, you need to make a decision to either sell, or to sell and go short. If you are neutral, you have to decide whether or not to stay neutral.
The decision concerning your investment should have nothing whatsoever to do with one's freedom of speech, or freedom of press, however much you personally disagree with it.
Simply IMHO,
Phil |
