#1, the 10Q has been discussed, I did not "attack you" I did not call you names, and citing Bullrider, is hardly a reference. You say you
know Johanna, what has been her follow-up? Since, you know her and have had "dealings with her" that information should be easy to obtain.
I'm not blindy bulling the stock, i'm only asking for some validity to what you are saying, again you are doing the attacking, i have not
accused you of anything other than stating your "opinion" which, i feel is nothing to go on... I too have looked at the patents anyone with a pc and IBM's patent lib. can look them up, it's another thing to understand their implications and enforcability, to which end I am no expert.
i'm only seeking knowlege, and thus far what i have been able to glean
is currently in favor of SRCM, (note not [scrm])... should new information come to light to the contrary, i would be more than interested in some valid points however, until that remarkable revelation as i feel it would be, comes to light, well...i'll stay long.
there are always two sides to any issue pro/con... each with merits
it's however, up to the individual to make a decision...
Daytraders were not the reason the stock got halted it was big blocks rapidly coming in that caused the halt...Institutions...and that volume has not crossed back at the bid. Friday, we saw some jerking up and mostly down on the bid/ask but, again a close look at the volume and trades shows it was small...(fear in the small investor) imho..the large institutions will not be moved by the day to day fluctuations as long as the core technology is in place. they like myself, can wait...
again, please report back to us on any verifiable follow-up that Johanna, can provide or any "other" verifiable source.
I tell you what, I'll even give it a shot, any idea besides, regular channels that you know of, as to how i could possibly contact her? Afterall, you do know her...
r1 |
