ENOUGH!!!
Let's try to stick with the facts here and get this thread back to where it's useful.
Couple of points:
1) I posted a science update Saturday that everybody probably skipped. This was from the CYGS resident biologist in reply to some medical discussion on another thread. It did, in part, restate the recent news in clearer terms:
"However, we can claim, as a first,that we have constructed a DNA vector that can synthesize any desired single-stranded DNA from an RNA template in vivo, therefore, it is a scientific breakthrough."
Believe them or not, and the company has not been hyping the stock, this is the current status.
2)
>Barry R. probably has little credibility with any of you thread
>readers. He will continue to pretend that he is not aware of this and
>will continue to pretend that he doesn't read my postings, Hi Barry.
Bullpuckey! Barry has been an active poster on this thread for months. Among the pre-hype-invasion crowd, Barry has more credibility than all of the other posters that have appeared in the last two days put together.
If anyone wants a fair appreciation of this company, just go back and read messages on this board BEFORE last Friday - no hype, fair comment.
Graham |
