OT
Obviously you either did not read my post to you, and/or merely used it as a point from which to make your own views known in other regards.
What group? I am in no group.
Too bad if people get angry. Is it impossible for them to be mature? I doubt whether shareholders of a big firm like WLA would react in such degrees of childishness and moronic behavior - as the attackers - that is more suited to the sandbox.
If the company is in any way ok, I doubt whether dissenting opinions will have any affect on their future and thus on the price of the stock. The overreaction this seems like the work of indignant bullies wanting everyone to join in the cheerleading.
I am not playing with anybody else's money. Nor is Janice.
I have not seen Janice post one unsupported inference. How? By quoting SEC documents? If they are negative, then they are negative in fact, not opinion. Nor have I posted anything unsupported.
Are you telling me you can't understand why people get angry with you?
Why you would ask this question unless it was to not reply to my own is beyond understanding.
I mentioned the lie - unsupported - posted against me in the form of an accusation that I had insider info - when of course nothing like that is even anywhere near the truth.
I don't see any of your 'good' people stepping into that to say well, if we're to be decent, post the item - or send it to him, or his friends, as they've requested or you're a liar.
Yet though that is initiated by the accuser they will step in quickly to ask that the thread be cleaned up - and ask me, not him.
Something wrong with that.
Or the death threats to Janice - anyone saying that's wrong? They have no place on stock threads (MTEI)...nope.
There's something wrong with that too.
I asked you to show me some of the personal attacks you spoke about. You posted none.
From what I've seen certain people with whom I might wish to be associated post facts that are disagreeable, and then the group launches their personal attacks in response. The same kind who would do the death threats, the false accusations, etc.
Their emotionalism is the problem, not anything I have said or done in regard to a stock. Nor anything I have seen Janice do.
If they were to post replies, in regards to any unpleasant facts that came to light, asking why it was posted or how it is relevant - without hostility -, you and others might see a completely different quality to the threads.
Check my posts if you care to do so. Even when I've been attacked by some people, whether directly or indirectly, if they post something to me that doesn't atttack I reply in kind.
But to ascribe the emotionalism of the immature to me, or the people I associate with is not a solution - it merely clouds the issue further. |
