Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 181.30

-0.5%

Dec 11 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: DTA who wrote (12558)	7/20/1998 12:38:00 PM
From: JMD	Read Replies (1) of 152472

DTA, you raise an interesting point re: perceived communications problems with the Q and its management. My remarks were directed at relations with the Wall Street community, whom I continue to believe generally cuts the Q precious little slack. Every company in the universe has been hammered by Asia and the Q was one of the first to fess up and go public with the carnage. Yet Wall Street felt they were not given proper guidance. Applied Materials said they same thing and Morgan was praised for candor. Go figure. Washington, D.C. seems to be another story. With the Beltway Boys, the Q appears to be on much better terms. Whether this is due to the Irwin/Jacobs tandem having longer familiarity with the FCC and Pentagon contracts, et.al. going back to Linkabit (sp?), Snowcroft, or Astrological rhythyms I have no idea. Certainly Kennard is a champion for CDMA and by extension the Q. Whatever, I will listen to the CC with great interest. Karnak

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next