International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: d:oug who wrote (33428)	7/20/1998 9:55:00 PM
From: go4it	Read Replies (2) of 35569

Doug, I will gladly support any positive measure for IPM share holders. Any evaluation of current conditions and/or changes to the officers of the company would have obviously go to a share holder vote. If anyone attempts this then it would require the leverage of the funds currently holding IPM stock. If you wanted to start an action then I suggest you start there. As I mentioned before, I am out of ideas but Cap gaurdian could easily perform that leveraged buyout at $0.10 a share that you spoke of. Just my thoughts and one other thought and that is that if actions are to be taken to save IPM then it should be done to save IPM not some vindictive agenda for revenge. Not that I am saying you would do that Doug but I do believe others would.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next