SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Napier International Technologies Inc. (T.NIR)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: xray who wrote (866)7/21/1998 12:33:00 PM
From: Greg from Edmonton   of 2444
 
The MSDS for SV-35/A seems to indicate the product as being quite harmless.

At the top there is a NFPA 704 Designation hazard rating.
Ratings of '0' = Insignificant hazard,
'1' = Slight
'2' = Moderate
'3' = High
'4' = Extreme.

here is the categorical hazard summary for SV-35/A:

'0' for Fire hazard
'1' for Health
'1' for Reactivity
'---' for Special.

So my interpretation on its hazard level is pretty much avoid drinking the stuff or splashing it directly in your eyes.

The component ingredients are also listed. Of course the MSDS still recommends exposure controls and some measure of protective equipment.

Teratogenicity: None
Reproductive Toxicity: None
Mutagenicity: None
Carcinogenicity: None

And under the Transportation Information section, the following statement:
SV-35/A is NOT regulated as a hazardous material under the regulations of the U.S. DOT, IMDG or in Canada TDG.

I have experienced good results with SV-35/A so far with no adverse effects realized, other than my hands kinda smelled a bit like the stuff afterwards. Not as badly as slicing onions though. And SV-35/A cleans up easily with water.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext