There is no need to be so negative towards others who believe in this company, especially those who are new to this site and trying it out for the first time. I am sure SI would love the tactfulness you use towards their potential customers.
Anyway, I have been reading this thread for months, I have owned IASCA stock for a year, and BruSi does have a real issue with John Robertson and the folks at IASCA. Seems the engine being promoted by Reg Technologies hasn't quite worked out the way everyone thought, and since John Robertson is its CEO, that same fate is now going to fall upon IASCA and its going to fail as well.
However, there is a distinct difference between the antenna that IASCA is promoting and the engine Reg Technologies has. The antenna is slowing proving itself as a viable technology and showing that it does work. With MobileComm and Arinc signing on, things are starting to fall into place. Even the US Government has faith in the technology, as it has signed several agreements with ITKG (which owns the military rights to the antenna) for proof of concept designs. ITKG recently has had the technical claims of the antenna verified by one of the largest testing and certification facilities in the county.
I am not going to debate whether or not BruSi has a legitimate beef with IASCA. However, if the technology continues to gain acceptance and is proven, the technology will sell itself. Companies will beat a path to IASCA's door, and little help will be required from the IASCA management team. Seems like a winning situation for all involved.
BruSi, you have blasted the IASCA management team on this thread for your problems with Reg Technologies, but you have yet to present any substantial facts to support the same issues on the IASCA side of the equation. Put the REG emotions aside and look at the opportunity here, the antenna does work and this stock will be a winner. |