Dowman:
I've followed your spirited discussions with greg. I think it's obvious to everyone that your inputs are based more in [apparent] fact while greg's are based more on emotion. I will not deny, however, that greg's observation about insider buying cannot be ignored. As Peter Lynch said, [paraphrasing]
"there's a thousand reasons why an insider will sell stock -- he wants to refinish his kitchen, tuition payments are due, a porche would be nice, he thinks the stock will depreciate in value. However, there's only one reason why an insider will buy stock: He thinks the stock will appreciate in value."
By the way.
I remain confused about something - your reluctance to reveal "sources". If this forum were a competitive environment like a news organization or a commercial enterprise where "sources" could be considered as intangible assets, I would understand. Presumably, there is no such context here. (?) Putting it another way, I do not see how revealing your sources would reduce any benefit to you; i.e., diminish the return on your hard work. You deserve credit for your resourcefulness and industry; however, unless there is reason other than "I don't like greg so I won't reveal sources to the forum", I remain bewildered.
There's a piece of the puzzle that's missing. |
