SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Shorting stocks: Broken stocks - Analysis

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dr. Seuss who wrote (1448)7/22/1998 12:53:00 PM
From: Steve Patterson  Read Replies (1) of 2506
 
Re: OCOM -- I'm gritting my teeth and holding on. Looking at the past record of Stock Genie, this pattern holds: a quick spike up followed by a continuation of the downhill slide the stock was on before their profile.

Not sure if I'll make it out with a profit, but I'll at least have much less of a loss than I had feared.

I noticed something else about their technology: the part they don't have done (the ATM codec) is the part that actually lets you send video over long distances. First, it means that their system isn't actually useful right now, because who cares about videoconferencing inside your own building? Second, this means they have the same bottleneck as every other videoconferencing company, which is that you have to pay for lots of dedicated digital bandwidth in order to do anything outside your own building.

So it's kind of neat to save money by using phone wires to send the signal internally, but is it cheaper to buy OCOM signal converters (and proprietary software) for teleconferencing only, or to just upgrade your internal routers/switches and have everything on your network go blazingly fast all the time? And what would your MIS department rather buy?

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext