That's right, you told me in advance, trusting me not to say a word...and I didn't, without you even having to ask. Nothing wrong with that.(Still not sure if you wanted me to sell out as well and assist you.)
In fact, there was nothing wrong with you coming on the thread, saying you had concerns and had sold out.
But you didn't leave it at that, you continued reminding us of your concerns on a very regular basis. Reminding us AFTER you sold. Over and over again.
Now, I have voiced my concerns and have told everyone well in advance that I will be selling into runups, while I am still LONG!
Why would I sell into runups? Because stocks run up and then stall, and in some cases get unmercilessly bashed after they run up. And because I have concerns over the ability of this management to cope with the growth, but not concerns with their integrity. But everyone here has lots of warning on what I will do in the FUTURE. I am telegraphing it weeks or months BEFORE we run up.
I know you see the difference between you and me here. You just don't want anyone else to see the difference.
You REPEATEDLY voiced UNSOLICITED concerns AFTER you sold. I told people what I will do in the FUTURE. It doesn't take a course in Mr. Einstein's theory to see the key difference between your post and my post.
I and the Davids are posting to ensure others don't fall for the garbage and panic sell. But you want to know something? If the stock gets hammered as a result of this, I could come out ahead. How? Because I would average down and have a much better chance of making a profit. But I refuse to assist you in bringing it down first. If that makes me stupid then so be it.
You came to the same conclusion about averaging down as I did. The difference is that, by the nature of your posts of concerns and references to serious allegations AFTER you sold, you WANT the stock to tank to exploit the opportunity. I would only react to the opportunity.
I'm going to post something I heard once in a movie, "Family Business", starring Sean Connery. It is so appropriate here:
"And he said,'What's the difference who turns the profit? Someone is going to buy that foreclosure, stock, whatever, at a steal, in any event.' And I(Connery) said,'The difference is ...You're mucking around in other people's misery. When you rob someone, legally, without risk, without sticking your neck out...That's immoral. You become nothing more than a <expletive deleted> parasite. Like most people, you confuse, what's moral with what's legal.'"
The bashers are operating out of their league. I have no intention of wasting my time responding to every single post of garbage that gets put up here. So, all of you that want to continue bashing, go right ahead. I feel I have stated the case well enough for reasonable people to make an informed decision.
Dealing with lightweights in this type of forum is exceedingly draining and frustrating. I now know what a special education teacher has to go through on a daily basis.
TG |
