Jeff, I hope you realize that Westergaard is paid to recommend a given stock. Part of his "service" is to sweep the internet clean of naysayers, because anyone who doesn't agree that his client is without fault must be crazy and therefore silenced.
As Svejk pointed out, he tried to silence a guy named Pluvia who urgently tried to warn people that Westergaard's client, PLSIA, was cooking the books. Westergaard put a $5000 bounty on his head, i.e. anyone who could give him information leading to Pluvia's true identity would get $5000. Now, nearly one year later, we know Pluvia was right, the stock has tanked, and there are several lawsuits pending against PLSIA. I'm not saying CLCK is a PLSIA, I'm saying a Westergaard endorsement is not without bias, so buyer beware... and, for your own protection, don't let Westergaard silence any naysayers should there be any!
BTW, ask yourself if CLCK were as good as you say, why would they need to hire Westergaard?
- Jeff |
