Larry,
I will assume, then, that you are referring to the "report" posted on the Assencio web site:
millzone.com
Jeez Louise Larry, you really are stretchin' it. This is not what:
>>>an intelligent reader will see it as documentation that SOLV was unable to make the system work in the field. No subsequent reports showed otherwise.<<<
You're makin this up, right?
It is far more likely that this is pure embellishment on some former employees opinion. Let's focus, Larry. This is not a "report", a published report, by an author striving for objectivity & reliability with empirical data from which to substantiate some scientific premise. This is allegedly an opinion by one man...potentially a "disgruntled man" and then exploited and spun by Assencio for his purposes.
Documentation? absolutely not...Propaganda? More likely.
But then, surely you don't suggest that Assencios "reports" are all 100% true....do you? And ...what if they aren't???...what percent are false?.....and if ANY are false ...and misleading...is this not the very kind of fraud you continually accuse SOLV of??
Research, I believe, is a process....not a button on some Assholes' website.
regards,
bigtoe |
