Joe,
Forgive me if I missed something here, but after skimming 90-100 posts, it's possible.
Didn't this train of discussion begin with someone alluding to the "phoney web-site" put up by one of Mork's alleged cronies and someone else (maybe you) replying something like "what's wrong with that, as long as it's accurate..." ? Now there is a debate over the accuracy of the site rather than the fundemental ethics involved.
What if I decided to put up a "Joe Master" web-site. Maybe I could include pictures of "the little woman" and the twins (these might be candids or from the family album, what's the difference as long as they are accurate, in fact, they might even be paid models as long as they presented a reasonably accurate presentation of the Master family), maybe a picture of Joe (possibly taken right after he had finished rodding out a drain) and, of course, a picture of the house, taken from whatever angle I feel is most suitable. Would there be anything wrong with that?
In fact, what if I included only the most flattering pictures I could find of the family and the house? Would this then be OK with you? I tend to doubt it. I think you would be incensed that I had the nerve to do such a thing, and you would probably be talking about lawsuits against me.
C'mon Joe, this isn't your style. You know the difference between right and wrong.
Regards,
AD |
