I would like the thread to note, not as an "I told you so", but just so we all have the facts straight, the part of Mr. Packer's post that stated that CTI's technology is not being used as a "pre-screening" device, but rather as a way to check suspicious mammograms, and as such would not avoid mammography, but hopefully could reduce the need for biopsies. Both Mr. Sorenson's and GWolf's posts talked about this as a pre-screening device, and the marketing problems that might present, but that is not the case.
My hope, too, GWolf, is that you will stick around. Profiteer was just trying to lighten things up, IMO, not to diss you. The action in the stock has brought a lot more activity and a lot of smog on this thread, but together we can do a pretty good job of keeping people focused. I would ask you to follow the example of chirodoc, who even when I got on his case a bit, very graciously responded and has continued to contribute.
Bob |
