Crystallex (KRY) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Syncrude who wrote (9484)	7/24/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: excalibur	Read Replies (1) of 10836

I believe you are wrong! As long as Jerry makes mention of the source, and of course he/they paid for the service, nothing in Canadian or US law prohibits publicly mentioning a summarization of even copyrighted material. As Jerry has stated, this occurs all the time and his example of The New York Times Pentagon Papers stories being summarized by others is correct. There is no violation of any laws here! You are upset, perhaps, because this reminds you of Carsons BS'ing and how you fell for it!? N'est pas? Perhaps you even wasted money on his "service"? And let us not forget psouami, that you had a valuation of $12-$13 on KRY with a SCJ victory and didn't sell at 90+% of that price! As I said before, at least I expected, with victory, $25+ for KRY. That is my excuse for not having sold! (You and I can also claim stupidity! After all, we both warned that we were relying on a decision from a Venezuelan Court!!!) <:( excalibur

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next