SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 509.17+0.6%3:09 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (9662)7/25/1998 4:23:00 PM
From: Charles Tutt  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
In response to your three items:

1) Unix OS's are not more expensive than MSFT's. Solaris for the X86 platform, for one, is priced competitively with NT, and Linux is much cheaper (free or nominal) than any of MSFT's OS's. I was shocked at the prices I've seen recently for NT; they appear to me to be MUCH HIGHER than those for Unix.

2) Win 98 does not seem to me to be a bargain, and I have not and will not buy a copy. Others obviously disagree with me, and that's fine.

3) This "point" is meaningless, because the competitors to MSFT's OS's are not "unsupported." We've just been through that. Of course there are varying degrees and means of support, as well as various pricing plans.

What exactly do you mean by a "supported patch" that's so mystical? Are you trying to say that Microsoft will come out and install the patch on my machine? Will they call me personally to warn me of a patch that cures a security hole? What do THEY do beyond just putting patches up on the Internet for downloading or otherwise making them available that makes the patches "supported" in your mind in contrast to others?

JMHO.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext