Webster, I do not know whether Hudson stuff is real or not, I have certainly not seen independent verification of his white stuff. I have read it, it looks extremely strange and quite "discombabulated" writings with hundreds of holes that could have been plugged by simple experiments. But frankly, Ovshinski's initial ramblings about amorphous semiconductors had as many holes as this. The latter, however, was rapidly followed by peer reviewed disciplined papers by many other scientists, the former, unfortunately is not.
I think that they should not include the Hudson stuff with their "Investor Package" myself, I saw that material two years ago and never thought it was worth mentioning, but I do not think any one at GPGI is qualified technically to determine the technical value of Hudson's ramblings. If GPGI based their work on Hudson stuff, I would be weary, but I do not think they do, they bring it up to counter the doubts people have in their own claims. I think that it is wrong, but who is asking me?
Zeev |
