Yeah, funny how people fling unsubstantiated and false information around, isn't it??
But you see Riley, we have caught you in a blatant and deliberate falsehood related to your reasons for hyping TVSI. You claimed it was merely due to a upswing in volume, when in reality you had access to inside information and were passing it around. And that, Riley is a Federal crime and quite possibly why you were subpoenaed.... hmmmm....
You're a liar Riley, and your own words confirm that.
And if you would lie about something as simple as your reasons for investing in a .27/share stock, what else would you lie about??
And actually, my posting is in response to the outright lies you are posting about me. It "may" be true that they is a civil complaint against me, but it ain't for stock fraud. And to say so is an outright fraud in its own right, as well being slanderous. Consider yourself warned that you should cease and desist in this activity until you produce the substantiation.
So, for now, in response, I think we should discuss the potential civil repercussions that may wind up pending against you. Your hardly an angel Riley, and you've certainly brought suspicion upon yourself (as well as a subpoena)
You're scared Riley and you should be, because someday your illusion will be unmasked and sharholders will discover how you witheld the true facts from them. And maybe, just maybe, one of them will have the guts and sense to file a lawsuit against you and RMIL.
But they can't do that until the alledged squeeze is confirmed (it would be cutting their own throats). So that is why I seized upon one of your sole "good" ideas in having street name shares transferred and accounted for.
Maybe you're not the only one who really doesn't want to know the truth about the squeeze.
Regards,
Ron |
