SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Tels Corp. Extremely Undervalued with Strong Fundamentals!
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dayuhan who wrote (21)7/26/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Shareholder  Read Replies (1) of 79
 
I have read the last few messages re Tels, and it is obvious to me which
are from shareholders, and which are from management. It is laughable
that one would comment that Tels was notified in Feb., and not Jan.
What is the difference. Does it mean that all companies that were
notified in Feb. are exempt from this rule. It is almost as funny that
they blame Nasdaq for the de-listing, and not the company. Is it the
fault of Nasdaq that the company is trading at $0.40 ? I was not aware
that Nasdaq was a public relations firm who maintained promotion
programs on companies. I was not aware that Nasdaq ran the corp. end of
companies whereby making them profitable so investors would be
attracted. How foolish I am. I thought it was the responsiblity of the
board and management to ensure that the company performed as promised to
investors. I thought it was the board and management who hired and
maintained a promotional program that would keep the company and the
company interests in view of potential investors, thereby keeping the
value of the stock at levels where this Nasdaq rule would not be an
issue. I can only speculate at the qualifications of the genius who
compared the CEO of IBM to the CEO of Tels. Try this scenario on for
size. The company promised good news this month. {The question is,
good news for whom!!!} If Tels goes to the BB, the share price will
drop, most likely to a dime. Who does that really hurt, the management
who collects salaries and wages, or the shareholders who invest in the
hope of increased value and or dividends. Who in their right mind
would continue to invest or buy stock in a company whereby the
management does not change, after they let it go to the BB. Todays
shareholders will be tomorrows sellers. I wonder who would buy the
stock . Maybe the only people who have made money in this company in
the past 2 years. Who are they? Check the company financials under
management costs and fees. Why would they want to buy the stock at a
dime? Try this on. Lets say a group who now owned say 30-50 percent
of Tels, could aquire up to 90 percent at a dime. How much would that
cost? Maybe $200,000.00 Look at the financials, what is the hard
asset value of the company. Ten or twenty times that. Somebody spoke
of a class action suit. Could this be what they meant????
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News