SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (30274)7/26/1998 6:50:00 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Looking at the charts of the major airlines. Don't know all the components of the XAL, but can see that it would have been wiser to do the index or at least 2 or 3 of these. I would have been in the money even if I had only made a second purchase.

I think your IIX puts are going to do well enough that if your favorite nets just sit there, you will still be happy.

Your thirds approach really seems to be the way to go, but it is so hard to buy the second or last third sometimes, when you see one or two previous buys under water. That's where I am with LU and it always seems -- just as is the case with LU, the volatilities seem to expand considerably as a stock reaches the final nosebleed territory.

Had I done this with DAL I would be in good shape on that one, also.

Still learning. Can you tell me how you go about spacing buys. I believe you've said it has to do with percentage rise, given the story has not changed. Do you choose the allowable rise bfore the second and third buys using the volatility of the stock, i.e. for two given stocks one that is more volatile -- you let it rise farther in percentage terms before the next buy?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext