SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : MTEI - Mountain Energy - No BASHING Allowed
MTEI 0.00400-14.9%Nov 18 9:31 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: blueHorse who wrote (6517)7/28/1998 5:00:00 PM
From: eric deaver   of 11684
 
Bluehorse:

This is what you are trying to ask hypothetical reserves (vs. proved reserves) not "hypothetical bituminous coal". Come on get you terms straight at least.

From:

energy.er.usgs.gov

"Hypothetical Resources: Quantitative estimates are based on a broad knowledge of the geologic character of a coal bed or
region. Measurements of coal thickness are more than 6 miles (9.6 km) apart. The assumption of continuity of a coal bed is
supported only by geologic evidence."

So now BH will contend that since the coal is only measured every six miles, reserves may actually be 3 miles apart. Nope, wrong. Two reasons - #1 this little line here: The assumption of continuity of a coal bed is supported only by geologic evidence. This can also be read that geologic evidence is used to support the assumption of continuity. and #2. It is expected that proved reserves will be reported by Dunn.

I posted this paper to the thread long before you even heard of MTEI and suggested that everybody read this paper to get familiar with the terminology we are expecting from Dunn. It is posted on the MTEI Info thread. If they report in hypothetical reserves, we will know what they mean. If they report in proved reserves (developed or undeveloped) we will know what they mean. This is the true meaning of DD.

See ya, BH.

Eric
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext