Naxos Resources (NAXOF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: jbIII who wrote (14902)	7/28/1998 6:48:00 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) of 20681

jb3: I would say that is a logical assumption. However, I think more probably Fred is gone because he had the nerve to challenge his Sidneyship as top dog. I am no Fred booster but if you have to pick the lesser of two evils, my instinct is to cast my lot with a guy who owns 1,000,000 shares not one who owns 4,000 shares and sells every time he gets the stock. I've spoken to Fred several times and I think he does sometimes let his emotions get the better of his judgment. I can sympathize with that failing. I'm often guilty of that myself. I think he also has a large ego which is often a characteristic of a man with his own agenda. I also know something about Fred's business and his business dealings and I am impressed with his acumen. Its a very mixed bag. When it comes right down to it I respect Fred for his good qualities and despite his failings because HE HAS THE BALLS TO CALL ME BACK OR E-MAIL ME EVEN WHEN HE KNOWS I'M NOT A HAPPY CAMPER. That is a great distinction in my mind. IMO, he treats the shareholders as co-owners, not mushrooms. I'm sorry to say I can't say that about his royal Sidneyship. JLA

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next