<<OFF TOPIC>> LOD, you may be long on Dell, but that doesn't mean we don't have our differences.
First of all, Clinton is innocent until proven guilty. Monica may have been lying from the start -- young people sometimes do that to attract attention. Clinton is our president and at least deserves the same respect we would give anyone accused of anything prior to trial -- the benefit of the doubt.
If he is guilty, I don't care. If they did it, she should have kept her mouth shut. If they didn't, she never should have opened it. What goes on between two consenting adults is not my concern, nor should it be yours. As for the issue of lying, it must first be proven. Even if he is lying, do you blame him? Even then, who cares? What's he supposed to say? What would you say if you had done it?
Clinton has been good for this country. He's kept the radicals on both side of the aisle in check. That, in and of itself, is a tremendous feat. We won't mention the budget deficit, which ballooned under Reagan and is now going into surplus. But we aren't here to argue ethics or politics. Let's talk about Dell.
This is the second time in a week you've wandered off-topic and taken some of the thread with you, the first being about the unfortunate incident at the Capital. Let's keep this on topic. Enough said. Please don't reply unless you have a Dell-related post. This will be my final post on this subject.
INTCfan |
