Milt, welcome to the ipmcf thread.
As Richard says over and over on the MXAM thread, the more
shareholders post, the more we all learn, and stronger for it.
Even if someone posts misleading or bad info, I feel that there
are enought threaders on this and ipmcf thread that have the
insight and experience to scope it out. Nothing wrong with any
threader asking us to take a path, just so Richard and the other
well knowned knowledgable pro-IPM are here to examine it. And if
bad advice or off the wall, lets simply say so and thank them for
helping us see paths and stuff we want to advoid. Important that
Charles and Rob and Paunch don't spend time on wild goose chases,
so it would be better for others to accept these new ideas and
suggesting and look for strengths and weaknesses.
On the ipmcf thread, I posted a post along these thoughts.
www2.techstocks.com
Also, to contact ipmcf shareholders that gave up on the ipmcf thread
when ipmcf went to 0.01, maby they are on other threads and are not
aware of whats happening. How can we "broadcast" a message. We could
as SI management if a note could be placed on the home page, and
it wouldn't take but one other thread reader to see and post on the
other thread. Also, who has accss to that Yahoo place that could
spread the word to get the attention of unaware ipmcf shareholders.
Doug
|
