SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Donner Minerals (DML.V)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (6352)7/29/1998 1:19:00 PM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (1) of 11676
 
Hi elizabeth. I thought others had covered off, more or less my thoughts, however, I will reiterate. If nickel was trading at $4.50, do you agree Inco would be proceeding with the Argentia smelter? If so, then what has the price of nickel "NOW" got to do with a deal that will last 35 years?? By the time the first chunk of nickel comes out of the ground, even Inco doesn't believe nickel will be $2.11!!

So rather than bargaining in good faith, they use the price of Nickel "now" to negotiate a "life of mine" contract. I am not "for" governmental interference, but in this case, Inco is trying to pull a con job!! You can be sure that if they did negotiate a sweetheart deal based on $2.11 nickel, Inco wouldn't come back and up the "ante" to the Newfoundland people if the nickel rebounded to $4.50!!

No, as I said, I disagree with you! The Quebec government through it to the "old" Newfoundland government with the Churchill hydro deal.....Tobin doesn't intend on letting Inco rape and pillage the Newfoundland people, and I don't blame him one bit!!

Can you elaborate on your reasons for disagreement or do you have to get clearance from the boss.

Cute!

the Chief
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext