SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scott Chase who wrote (9675)7/29/1998 4:50:00 PM
From: David  Read Replies (1) of 26039
 
I didn't mean to suggest that Compaq and Mastercard "must not know what they're doing." However, what they are doing at this opening stage of the market is not necessarily what they will have to do at more mature, integrated stages.

At this stage of the market, IDX is offering security features, at extra cost, that are unnecessary to those products. The Compaq/IDT deal is basically a very secure on/off switch, not unlike some others coming on the market. That will only get you so far; it will not help very well when there is a need for remote bio-ID over the Internet. The Mastercard/IDT biometric smart card is basically secure in your pocket, and unusable to a thief, but will likewise not be very secure when the market reaches into remote bio-ID.

I believe that Compaq and Mastercard are trying to introduce biometric products at as inexpensively as possible in order to develop a large market. There is no need for extra safeguards at extra cost when you are doing this. But as devices get more integrated along networks, the need for security will increase quite quickly. That's when the IDX pitch becomes more persuasive.

Fowler was critical of the competition. So what? That's unethical?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext