Jon, are you, once again, arguing against Zulu becuase that's what you're conditioned to do? I would at least think your memory would be strong enough to remember the reasons why you opposed SesameAd in the first place.
Remember the whole bandwidth debate? When you said that supporting technology didn't yet exist for Sesame? Readers should go back to SI posts 2500 to 3500 for that one. If anyone were to go back and research Tara's prior opposition to SesameAd, you'd wonder why he's asking the kind of question he poses now. You might even question his question.
You see, Jon has never had any other role, with respect to Zulu, other than to create doubt in the minds of Zulu investors. This is well documented. Because the bandwidth argument has been solved, he now has resorted to implementing doubts on the patent for SesameAd. SesameAd exists, Zulu owns it and it will be utizlied. In fact, it's quite futuristic, and the primary reason why I invested in Zulu in the first place.
And better than that, customers will buy it when the time is right. That time is close, because the bandwidth problem gets solved more and more each day, via more and more cable modems. I might point out that video teleconferencing will become more prevalent for much the same reason as will be the acceptance of SesameAd.
But I don't want to leave you without an answer. So to get your answer, Jon, you must direct your inquiry to Tom Burgess, patent holder and creator of SesameAd. He lives in Newport, Rhode Island. You can find him, if you want to. That's where the answer to your question is--not here. |
