I take your comments very graciously and thank you for being candid with me and you are certainly right in most you say, IMO. Do know how redundant my posts were, certainly was a reason for same. I apologized to those I had contact with and I guess I take this opportunity to apologize to those that followed the thread daily. I too got very tired of it, timely to say the least and that was an overload of typing on my part....*vbg*, much less the research of posts to provide all those facts to refute. And I am glad that is behind me also, mighty glad.
At least you and one other have said it was entertaining and I chuckle at that now. Also, thanks for saying you enjoyed reading any one of them. Have to agree that some directed to me were just down right entertaining to me too, especially about the PTA and apron strings. Been a caretaker all my life, really nailed me, huh? *LOL*
Hey, blame no one if they do not take for granted anything said and the former NVID officers did do a lot of news releases that were definitely hype with no backup.
You are absolutely correct about the snapshot. We investors will have to wait for the big picture ss well as the SH meeting. I do believe they will only release what they feel is documented and verifiable. Will look forward to meeting you along with the others at the SH meeting, if you can make it. Maybe we will have much more to celebrate this year.
I have asked some pretty forward questions on the times I have called and talked with either. Got answers to some and not to others. Anyone else can do that too. Whether they share their information with me is irrelevant. I am appreciative if they do and if they don't I am not offended. Their choice. And, I too may believe or disbelieve what they post.
I am not that concerned about being pinned down. I do know my rights and choices and my choice will be to ignore them. I don't think I am in a credibility contest here with bashers and I certainly do know the games that are played by them. Agree with you, any information that is posted can be taken with a grain of salt if so desired. I have no problem with that. I have been criticized about not having an email address on this thread and what I thought was a demand to me was made. That is OK, but that is a decision that I choose for myself. Don't respond to demands from total strangers very well. Those that I want to know, will know, that's all. Now SI has added PM's. Have you checked yours lately? At first, had a hard time remembering to do that. Something new added to SI. Most of the bashers are non-investors and just looking to start trouble on a thread. No one has to be specific unless they choose to. And, the investors probably, especially those at the SH meeting certainly have an inkling of what that statement means.
If my sharing what I learned today came across as my enthusiasm, then I really do need to rethink how I am responding and correct it. Maybe at a later date I will say that I am enthusiastic but too much is unknown to me at this point. I know this is a risky situation as any small cap is and I have read many times, "Do not fall in love with a stock". I do appreciate constructive criticism, however. Can't do anything but help I have found. And, like you, I am suspicious and do not trust most on any of these threads. I really do take "Terms of Use" seriously in that the person posting may not be who they say they are. Some of the investors or previous investors I do know and I do consider them to be friends and most trustworthy. They have proven themselves to me, by my own criteria. I certainly do not want to sound like I am hyping and I appreciate you bringing that to my attention.
Sometimes even your best friends won't tell you....*LOL*
My regards,
n(Naomi)haynes |
