SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trico Marine Services (TMAR)
TMAR 22.410.0%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Robert T. Quasius who wrote (619)7/31/1998 6:57:00 PM
From: JEFF A. KEHL  Read Replies (1) of 1153
 
Let's pretend for a minute that the analyst at Raymond James knows what he/she's talking about. Here's his/her predictions as posted previously:

<<TMAR: RAYMOND JAMES decreased estimate for fiscal year ending
12/98 from $2.10 to $1.45 on 07/24/98
TMAR: RAYMOND JAMES decreased estimate for fiscal year ending
12/99 from $2.25 to $0.90 on 07/24/98

TMAR: RAYMOND JAMES increased estimate for fiscal year ending
12/98 from $1.45 to $1.50 on 07/28/98
TMAR: RAYMOND JAMES made new estimate for long term EPS growth
of 17.00% per year on 07/28/98 >>

Using their numbers and the PEG method of stock valuation I get the following as a target stock price:

1998 - $25.50 ($1.50 in earnings)
1999 - $15.30 ($.90 in earnings)
2000 - $34.85 ($2.05 in earnings)
2001 - $40.80 ($2.40 in earnings)

I am filling in the 2000 and 2001 earnings by assuming 17% earnings growth from the $1.50 not from the .90. This seems reasonable to me since the lowest they've been in the past 5 quarters is .47 a share and the current problems with day rates in the gulf and oil prices should be worked out by 2000.

So if I'm a Raymond James customer shouldn't I be buying TMAR like crazy? Almost 300% gain in 3 1/2 years. Where else except Yahoo can I get returns like that?

Now let's assume Raymond James is wrong and that TMAR's managment has successfully negotiated this temporary slowdown by diversifying in the north sea, focusing on newer, better vessels, and a conservative drydocking strategy. Under this scenario they'll earn about $2 in 1998 and their earnings will not plummet in 1999 but continue to grow. This by the way is what the consensus of analysts listed on Yahoo said and have yet to revise. I'll use Raymond James 17% earnings growth rate.

1998 - $34.00 ($2.00 in earnings)
1999 - $39.78 ($2.34 in earnings)
2000 - $46.58 ($2.74 in earnings)
2001 - $54.40 ($3.20 in earnings)

Have I done anything wrong in my estimates???
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext