Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG)

MYNG 0.0700

+5.7%

Feb 21 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: George Castilarin who wrote (11747)	7/31/1998 9:56:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) of 34075

Well after 2900 samples even an artifact variance of 50% will even out. I ran into variances of 100% in one hard rock fire assay lab and the averages were still the same as my assays where natural variance appeared to be less than 35%. Artifact on repeat pulps was less than 7% and on rejects of course artifact varied up to 25%. If we are talking accuracy then losses are immaterial unless there is a variance in the loss. Precision would be low but the variance may take care of that. If you have high losses go for low low accuracy and the real result will come out in the average. Strange but true. If I had an approximate loss rate of 50% but I could influence the nugget effect to give me a 100% artifact variance the average would not see my loss. Dicey. EC<:-}

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next