Lonnie:
The example of Ballard was not to compare AENG with it,whether you
are for or against AENG. My reasoning is that with Balalrd as
you stated , you have many years of experimentation , patents
contracts , hoopla etc. So what is the bottom line or where is
the beef ?. If you follow the Ballard SI thread , you will note
that 98% of the posts are about the price of the stock , how or
when it will go up or down , or just plain hustling. It does not
appear that the posters have a clue about the technology , because
even the partners of Ballard know for sure ,or can state with
any certainty if and when this technology will be marketed.
So if a religion is organized or not , it is still religion . Big
companies goof all the time , they only difference is that they
can afford to so.
I have some knowledge of fuels, the most ideal would be hydrogen ,
for reasons that are obvious. Fuel cells do not have the thrust
required for most engine uses and are not economical. This is not
saying that they can not work or will not work in the future. What
is stated clearly , the technology of fuel cells has a long way to
go in order to meet the intended uses.
It is also not correct to say that the stock price has a direct
correlation to the value of a technology , not matter if it is high
or low. The world of technology is not that simple, to enable us to
evaluate the worth of an idea by the price of the stock , this is
evidently absurd.
AENG is on record that it is working on the OX2 at this time , if
this is not true than they are lying , if they are working on it
and it is true , then the question answers itself. Everyone can
decide for themselves |
