SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera!
NAMX 0.00010000.0%Nov 7 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bob who wrote (4230)8/1/1998 4:46:00 PM
From: T N  Read Replies (1) of 4736
 
bob,
after reading the Ebeling letter again , I must say PAESEMIO and he
are definatley the same. I was close to the vest in another public company who among turmoil the head man resigned before getting the boot, and then tried to regain control with his smoke and mirrors, but he again was booted, just like Ebeling will be. I'm sure he's the bad guy. The only reason he resigned isn't because he was denied access, but he knew the boot was comming when the access was denied.
Ebeling's letter to the shareholders is pure propaganda and I'm sure full of views from rose colored glassess. Time will tell and soon we'll be saying Stamm the Man not Stamm the Clamm. This guy Stamm is smart----talking about new hook-ups being imaterial to 'per share'
earnings wait and see good things comming, just like someone posted before no signifigant upward move until the share issue is resolved, I think the reverse split will eventualy have something to do with getting to the bottom of it. Once the 60 days of exchange are over I feel the revenue flow will be much higher than anyone anticipated to bad I'll be gone 'cause I'm out at a stop loss as soon as the bid hits .01625. I'll still reAD THIS BOARD EVERY DAY. oNE THING IS FOR SURE Ebeling/PAESEMIO either has a secretery or he sure writes good or is it well?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext